African Peer Review Mechanism Survey(APRM)-2006
First Round

Nigeria, 2006

Get Microdata

Reference ID

NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1

Producer(s)

National Bureau of Statitics(NBS)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Oct 18, 2010

Last modified

Dec 02, 2013

Page views

959031

Downloads

28335

Health (Ob1q16b)

Data file: APRM-INDIVIDUAL

Overview

Valid: 18760

Invalid: 1038

Minimum: 1

Maximum: 5

Type: Discrete

Decimal: 0

Start: 159

End: 159

Width: 1

Range: 1 - 5

Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question

Rank the benefits of these facilities to you or the community. Recording the code for one of these options against the facilities: - Health
1 = Excellent; 2 = Good; 3 = Fair; 4 = Poor; 5 = Very poor

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
1	Excellent	2662	14.2%
2	Good	7975	42.5%
3	Fair	4051	21.6%
4	Poor	2078	11.1%
5	Very poor	1994	10.6%
Sysmiss		1038

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog