African Peer Review Mechanism Survey(APRM)-2006
First Round

Nigeria, 2006

Get Microdata

Reference ID

NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1

Producer(s)

National Bureau of Statitics(NBS)

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Oct 18, 2010

Last modified

Dec 02, 2013

Page views

800727

Downloads

27119

Identification

Survey ID number

NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1

Title

African Peer Review Mechanism Survey(APRM)-2006

Subtitle

First Round

Abbreviation or Acronym

APRM 2006

Translated Title

No translation

Country

Name	Country code
Nigeria	NGA

Study type

Statistical Info. & Monitoring Prog. [hh/simpoc]

Series Information

The African Peer Review Mechanism Survey Round 1 (2006) is the first round of APRM surveys, conducted in the country. APRM survey are designed by National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

Abstract

The African Peer Review Mechanism Survey APRM (2006) are designed by National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
The survey is a programme of the New Partnership for Africa,s Development (NEPAD) for fostering good governance in Africa countries. It is basically a mutually adopted instrument for self-monitoring by African countries, using agreed African and international standards. The peer review process is designed to enthrone and deepen good governance in the continent. Each country is expected to carry out a self-assessment of its performance on Essentially, the survey covered the 36 States of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.
All the four Thematic Areas of APRM were covered. These were:
(a) Democracy and Political Governance
(b) Economic Governance and Management
(c) Socio-economic Development
(d) Corporate Governance.

Kind of Data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Unit of Analysis

Household and Individual analysis.

Version

Version Description

version 1.1

Version Date

2008-09-19

Version Notes

version 1.0 - Data set for generating tables and report .
version 1.1 - Further editing of the data, for external use only no table nor report was generated.

Scope

Notes

The scope of the survey covered the four thematic areas mentioned above. All objectives under each thematic area were covered. Demographic information were also collected from the respondents and other members of their household.
The Household gives information about members who usally live in the household.
The Individual gives information on socio-economic development.

Topics

Topic	Vocabulary	URI
economic policy [1.3]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
rural economics [1.6]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
unemployment [3.5]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
conflict, security and peace [4.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
domestic political issues [4.2]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
elections [4.3]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
government, political systems and organisations [4.4]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion [4.6]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
political ideology [4.7]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
law enforcement [5.2]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
crime [5.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
legal systems [5.3]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
legislation [5.4]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
basic skills education [6.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
housing [10.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
gender and gender roles [12.6]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
youth [12.10]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
community, urban and rural life [13.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
social welfare policy [15.1]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common
specific social services: use and provision [15.3]	CESSDA	http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common

Keywords

Education Employment status Occupation Religion Age Measures Corruptions Illiteracy Indiscipline Poverty alleviation Electricity Financial services Government Community Potable water and sanitation Subsistence agriculture Commercial agriculture Small-scale business Formal employment Proper housing Inflation

Coverage

Geographic Coverage

National Zone State Senatorial district

Universe

The survey covered all household members (usual residents) starting with name of household head.

Producers and sponsors

Primary investigators

Name	Affiliation
National Bureau of Statitics(NBS)	Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN)

Producers

Name	Affiliation	Role
Field services and methodology department, Censusess and Survey Department	NBS	Questionnaire design
Field services and methodology department	NBS(HQ)	Sampling and Selection
Field services and methodology department	NBS(All state)	Data collection
Computer management and servises	NBS(Zonal HQ)	Data Entry
Computer management and servises	NBS(HQ)	Data Processing
Computer management and servises	NBS(HQ)	Data Analysis

Funding Agency/Sponsor

Name	Abbreviation	Role
National Bureau of Statitics	NBS	Funding
New Partnership for African’s Development (NEPAD)	(NEPAD)	Funding
National Focal Point Secretariat	APRM	Funding

Other Identifications/Acknowledgments

Name	Affiliation	Role
Amb. Aluko	APRM	Coordinator
Prof. Roberts	NISER	Consultant
Mr Ekujimi	NBS	Consultant
Prof. Gboyega	ECA	Consultant

Sampling

Sampling Procedure

The survey covered all the thirty-six states of the federation and FCT, Abuja. Both Urban and Rural areas were covered in each state. Three Local Government Areas (LGAs) were selected in each state as well as FCT, Abuja. One LGA was selected from the senatorial districts where the state capital is located. The other two LGAs were selected from the remaining senatorial districts. The selection of the 2 LGAs was based on remoteness from the state capital or on ecological factors e.g upland or riverine areas of the state. Ten Enumeration Areas (EAs) were selected per LGA making a total of 30 EAs per state. In each EA 20 households were covered. Thus, at national level, a total of 1,110 EAs and 22,200 households were covered.

The sample size from the State to the household level was as follows;

3 Senatorial Districts/ LGAs were selected in each State plus the FCT, Abuja.
110 LGAs were selected nationwide
10 EAs were selected from each LGA
1110 EAs were selected nationwide
20 Households were scientifically selected from each EA.
600 Households were scientifically selected from each State plus the FCT, Abuja.
22,200 Households were scientifically selected nationwide.
Out of 20 persons interviewed in an EA, 8 persons were male headed/Adult households, 7 persons were female headed/Adult households and 5-unmarried youth (18-24years). The breakdown of the youths respondents were 2 males and 3 females.

At EA level, 1094 EAs were studied out of 1, 110 EAs expected to be covered
Out of 22,200 Households expected to be covered ,21,808 were actualy canvassed

Deviations from the Sample Design

No Deviation

Response Rate

On a national basis the survey achieved a response rate of 98.56 percent at EA level and
at household level the response rate was 98.23 percent.

Weighting

The formula adopted in calculating the design weights for the survey data (sample results) were as follows:

(i) The probability of selecting an EA within a state was obtained by dividing the total number of EAs sampled in a
state by total number of EAs in that particular state. Let this be represented by fj. That is,
fj = (Total Number of EAs sampled in a state)/(Total Number of EAs in that particular State)

(ii) Likewise, the probability of selecting an housing unit (HU) within an EA was obtained by dividing the total number
of housing units selected in an EA by the total number of housing units (HUs) listed in that particular EA. Let this be
represented by fk. That is,
fk = (Total Number of HUs selected in an EA)/(Total Number of HUs listed in that particular EA)

Then the product (fj) x (fk) represented by f is the sampling fraction for each of the corresponding study unit (Enumeration Area) for all the 1,110 EAs canvassed throughout the 36 states of the Federation and FCT, Abuja. The inverse of the sampling fraction is known as the design weight and was applied accordingly to all the study units.

Mathematically,
Design weight = ((Total number of EAs in a state)/(Total number of EAs sampled in that particular state)) X ((Total Number of HUs listed in an EA)/(Total Number of HUs selected in that particular EA))

The above value was obtained for each of the 1,110 EAs canvassed throughout the 36 states of the Federation and FCT, Abuja. Thereafter, adjustment factors were applied to adjust for the non-responses.

Survey instrument

Questionnaires

The household questionnaires were structured question based on general Knowledge about the APRM.
While the Individual questionnaires were structured question on about four thematic with different objective.SOCIO-
The First Thematic Socio-Economic Development have six objective:OPMENT
Objective 1: Promotion of Self-Reliance and Sustainable Development.
Objective 2: Accelerating Socio-Economic Development.
Objective 3: Strengthening Policies and Delivery Mechanism.NCE AND ANAGEMENT
Objective 4: Ensuring Affordable Access to Water, Sanitation,Energy and Finance.
Objective 5: Progress Towards Gender Equality.
Objective 6: Promote and Encourage Broad based participation in Development by all Stakeholders at all Levels.

The Second Thematic Economic Governance and Management have five objective:
Objective 1: Promotion of Macro-Economic Policies for Sustainable Development.
Objective 2: Implementation of Sound, Transparent and predictable Micro-Economic Policies.
Objective 3: Promotion of Sound Public Finance Management.
Objective 4: Fighting Corruption and Money Laundering.
Objective 5: Accelerating Regional Integration

The Third Thematic Corporate Governance have three objective:
Objective 1: Promotion of Enabling Environment and Effective Regulatory Framework for Economic Activities
Objective 2: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability
Objective 3: Promoting the Adoption of Good Business Ethics
The Four Thematic Corporate Governance have five objective:
Objective 1: Prevention and Reduction of Intra- and Inter-State Conflicts
Objective 2: Constitutional Democracy, Political Competition, the Ruleof Law, Citizen Rights and Supremacy of the Constitution
Objective 3: Promotion and Protection of Political, Civil, Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights
Objective 4: Separation of Powers and Protection of the Independence
of the Judiciary and Legislature
Objective 5: Accountable, Efficient and Effective Public/Civil Service
Objective 6: Fighting Corruption in the Political Sphere.
Objective 7: Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women.
Objective 8: Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Children and Young Persons.
Objective 9: Promotion and Protection of the Rights Of Vulnerable Groups.
All questionnaires and modules are provided as external resources.

Methodology notes

The data entry was done manually at two zone. The total of sixty desktop computers where used for the entry.The data entry screen was developed in Cspro. Ten operators per Zone were use making the total of sixty operator and six supervisor.
At the HQ about six computer programer where used to merged the data together and generate the table needed. The data was processed EA by EA each EA being processed as a complete unit through each stages of data processing. The EAs goes through the following steps:

Questionnaire reception
Office editing and coding
Data entry
Completeness checking
Verification entry
Back up of raw data
Data editing
Back up of edited data
Then all the EAs are processed, all the data were concatenated together and then the following steps are completed for all data files;
Merging the data
Export to SPSS in 2 files (APRMHH - household, APRMIN-Individual)
Recording of variables needed for analysis
Adding of sample weights
Structural checking of SPSS files
Data quality tabulations
Production of analysis tabulations
After completion of all processing in CSPro, all individual EAs files were backed up before concatenating data together using the files concatenated utility.
For tabulation and analysis SPSS versions 13.0 was used.
Details of each these steps can be found in the data processing documentation, data editing guidelines, data processing programs in CSPro and SPSS and tabulation guidelines.

Data collection

Dates of Data Collection

Start	End	Cycle
2006-09-14	2006-09-25	12 days

Time periods

Start date	End date	Cycle
2006-09-14	2006-09-25	12 days

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Data Collectors

Name	Affiliation	Abbreviation
National Bureau of Statitics	Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN)	NBS

Supervision

A roving team of 12 interviewers and 3 supervisors per state were used.
A supervisor supervises 2 teams comprising of four enumerators.
3 LGAs were canvassed for per state.
5 Housing Units/Households/persons would be covered by an interviewer in each EA. Training of interviewers and supervisors carried out by competent Headquarters' senior staff. Close supervision in the field by state officers, zonal controllers and monitoring officers from the Headquarters.
After 5 days of data collection, 6 monitoring officers from the Headquarters would visit the 6 zonal officers.
To monitor and quality check the available records.
To bring the completed records to Abuja Headquarters.
Also monitoring the data collection are staff of APRM and NOA.

Data Collection Notes

The pretest survey was designed and actually covered six States of the federation, with one State from each of the six geo-political zones. Specifically, the States selected were Plateau (North Central), Borno (North East), Kaduna (North West), Enugu (South East), Cross River (South South) and Oyo (South West). The sample size was small. Only one LGA was selected in each of the six States that fell into the sample. With the sample design explained above, only 20 households were canvassed for information in each selected State/LGA and 120 households nationwide.
In the process of collecting the data, two teams of two Enumerators and a Supervisor formed a roving team that covered each LGA. A team worked in each sector. Other personnel that participated in the pretest were the Training Officers from the headquarters, the State Officer and the Zonal Controller. The pretest was monitored by APRM Thematic Coordinators.
At the end of the pretest, it was evident that some of the questions had to be reframed and some technical terms broken down into simpler language for easy understanding and interpretation. The questionnaire itself took an average of three and half to four hours to administer. The MHS questionnaire was found out to be very bulky and it was like conducting four (4) surveys in one because all the four Thematic Areas were contained in one questionnaire. NBS technical staffs were mandated to review the questionnaire along with APRM Thematic Coordinators who provided the needed technical support before embarking on the main survey.

Main Survey
The Mass Household Survey covered all the 36 States of the Federation and the F.C.T, Abuja. As explained above in the survey design, 3 LGAs/ 30 EAs were selected in each State. Six hundred (600) households were canvassed for information in each State plus the F.C.T, Abuja with 200 households per LGA. Twelve (12) Interviewers/Enumerators of six roving teams with three (3) Supervisors worked in each State and the F.C.T, Abuja. A supervisor covered two teams of four Interviewers/Enumerators. On the whole, four hundred and forty four (444) Interviewers/ Enumerators plus one hundred and eleven (111) Supervisors were engaged for the field exercise nationwide. Each team covered five (5) EAs and the data collection was completed in twelve (12) days.
The Mass Household Survey was closely monitored by APRM Team of Monitors led by the National Coordinator of APRM, National Orientation Agency (NOA) in all the thirty (36) States plus the F.C.T; Abuja and NBS team of monitors. NOA came in at the instance of APRM. The Senior Staff of NBS comprising Headquarters Staff, Zonal Coordinators, State Officers and Principals of NBS Training Schools formed the internal supervisory and monitoring team.

Data processing

Data Editing

The collected data will first be checked manually by a team of editors at the Zone. The same team of editors will do the coding before entry to ensure that all entries are accurate, consistent and the questionnaire is ready for processing .A data entry screen was developed using Cspro software. This data management software have in-built range checks that format and correct skip or filter errors at the point of entry. The data were merged at the HQ where structural checking of SPSS were done on the data set before generating tables.
The massiveness of the questionnaire and the size of the sample (22,200) informed NBS to resolve into taking the following decisions:
i. Hiring of additional external hands.
ii. Putting trained personnel on 60 computers to do data entry at the headquarters and two zones Kaduna and Ibadan.
iii. Co-opting members of staff from other Departments/ Units like Censuses and Surveys, Corporate Planning and Technical Coordination, Field Services and Methodology, and Prices unit to join hands with the staff of Computer Management and Information Services for the data entry.
iv. Carrying questionnaires of 10 States each to Zonal Offices at Kaduna, Ibadan and HQ for data entry.
The data entry did not end until 6th November 2006.

All the grouping and the list of staff are provided as external resources.

Data appraisal

Estimates of Sampling Error

Twenty two thousand and two hundred (22,200) questionnaires were distributed nationwide with 600 questionnaires per State plus the FCT, Abuja. The retrieval rate was 100 percent in most States except in the following States: Lagos (499 i.e 83 percent); Rivers (532 i.e. 89 percent); Kogi (540 i.e. 90 percent); Bayelsa (571 i.e. 95 percent); Cross River, Enugu, Gombe, Nasarawa, Ogun ( 580 i.e. 97 percent); Imo (587 i.e. 98 percent); FCT, Abuja (591 i.e. 98.5 percent); Ondo (594 i.e 99 percent); and Kwara (595 i.e. 99 percent). On the whole, 21,808 (i.e. 98.23 percent) questionnaires were retrieved and analyzed. See the attached table. On the basis of geo-political zone, only the North West zone had 100 percent returns Others ranged from 96 percent (South West) to 99 percent (North East and South East).
Summary of Sample Achieved
Numeration Area (EA) Households (HHs)
S/No Zone no. of State Expected Achieved Response Rate (%) Expected Achieved Response Rate (%)
1 NW 7 210 210 100 4200 4200 100
2 NE 6 180 179 99 3600 3580 99
3 NC 7 210 206 98 4200 4106 98
4 SW 6 180 176 98 3600 3472 96
5 SS 6 180 174 97 3600 3483 97
6 SE 5 150 149 99 3000 2967 99
National 37 1,110 1,094 99 22,200 21,808 98

Data Appraisal

A series of data quality tables and graphs are available to review the quality of the data on the following:
i Age and Sex Distribution of Persons
ii. Distribution by relationship to head of the household
iii. Marital Status
iv. Education
v. Employment Status
vi. Occupation
vii. Institutional sector and
viii. Religion

The general knowledge about APRM also shows a lots of graphs on
. Knowledge about APRM.
. Source of medium
. Awareness
. Instruments and standards
. Complying with the Objectives of the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs)
. Challenges facing government in implementing the NEPAD initiative.

Data Access

Access authority

Name	Affiliation	URL	Email
NBS	Fedral Government of Nigeria (FGN)	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng	feedback@nigerianstat.gov.ng

Confidentiality

Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required?	Confidentiality declaration text
yes	The confidentiality of the individual respondent is protected by law (Statistical Act 2007) This is published in the Official Gazette of the Federal republic of Nigeria No. 60 vol. 94 of 11th June 2007. See section 26 para.2. Punitive measures for breeches of confidentiality are outlined in section 28 of the same Act.

Access conditions

A comprehensive data access policy is been developed by NBS, however section 27 of the Statistical Act 2007outlines the data access obligation of data producers which includes the realease of properly anonymized micro data.

Citation requirements

African Peer Review Mechanism Survey Round 1 (2006)-v1.1

Disclaimer and copyrights

Disclaimer

The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Contacts

Name	Affiliation	Email	URL
G.O Adewoye	Director Census & Surveys	goadewoye@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
A.N.Adewimbi	Head of Information and Comnucation Technology Department	taadewnmbi@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
Biyi Fafumi	Data Curator	biyifafunmi@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
Mr R.F. Busari	ICT	rfbusari@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
A.A.Akinsanya	Data Archivist	paakinsanya@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)	Fedral Government of Nigeria (FGN)	feedback@nigerianstat.gov.ng	http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng

Metadata production

DDI Document ID

DDI-NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1